Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Against. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Against. Afficher tous les articles

October 11 2011, Chad Holloway

Legal Action versus AGCC

On Tuesday, Antanas “Tony G” Guoga, primary shareholder of PokerNews, announced his intention to pursue legal action against the Alderney Gambling Control Commission (AGCC). Guoga claims the commission was negligent in the handling of the Full Tilt Poker (FTP) situation, failed to exhibit due diligence for their licensees and should be held responsible.

The legal action being considered hinges on the fact that the AGCC knew there was a problem involving player funds prior to the Black Friday indictments, were negligent in their handling of the situation; and therefore, ought to be held responsible.

The AGCC was established in 2000 and is "independent and non-political, and regulates gambling on behalf of the States of Alderney. Consisting of the Chairman and three members, it includes people with international experience in the fields of gaming, regulation and licensing. The single most important policy of the Commission is to provide a regulatory environment that meets the highest international standards and thereby both protects the reputation of Alderney and attracts 'world-class' operations."

According to the AGCC, its mission is "to ensure and maintain the integrity of the electronic gambling industry in Alderney." And its objectives include ensuring that "all electronic gambling on Alderney is conducted honestly and fairly, the funding, management and operation of electronic gambling on Alderney remains free from criminal influence, and electronic gambling is regulated and monitored so as to protect the interests of licensees' customers as well as the young and vulnerable."

“We believe they knew about it a long time ago,” Guoga said in regard to the AGCC, “That security for the players’ money was not there, they hid this fact together with their auditors for years, benefiting in return. We raised it with them and they knew then and there.”

Jon Sykes, CEO of Vont Limited confirmed that "The security statement for the players’ money was not there, this was raised with them, and they knew that FTP was in breach of regulations back in December 2010."

Not having a designated clause in FTP’s Terms & Conditions was against AGCC regulations, a fact Tony G and company claim the AGCC ignored for many months, constituting negligence.

FTP did add a statement, regarding player funds, to its site around the end of February or beginning of March 2011, stating they were not segregated: "Customer funds are not segregated from company funds, but it is the intention of Filco Ltd to meet its liabilities as they fall due."

Guoga said: "Surely such a breach of the regulations for such a long period prior to the omission being highlighted to the AGCC by Sykes in late 2010 must have initiated a full review of the operator and its financial position by that stage, which then begs the question, how long did they know about the precarious financial position before they finally pulled the plug following the DOJ indictments? We want to prove that they have responsibility, we are coming after them.”

As Sykes contends:

“It appears likely that this statement was added to the site as a result of my contact and the Commission’s subsequent investigations. Obviously, before the issues with the indictments this was perceived to be more of a minor clerical issue for the Alderney Regulators and FTP but now I wonder if there was more to it.”

Sykes and Vont Limited will manage the claim and are currently in discussions with legal advisers. In addition, it is expected that a channel will be opened for players to join the complaint and submit information regarding their balances, though such specifics have not yet been determined.

Stay up to date on all the latest news by following us on Twitter and liking us on Facebook.

Follow Chad Holloway on Twitter — @ChadAHolloway


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

AppId is over the quota
October 05 2011, Chad Holloway, Elaine Chaivarlis

FTP/PokerStars

Full Tilt Poker (FTP) and PokerStars are facing more legal repercussions in the form of a lawsuit filed by software company, Cardroom International. The lawsuit was filed simultaneously in the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of New York, and the Santa Monica Division of the Superior Court of California. In the lawsuit, Cardroom International declares "ownership interest in, and makes a claim upon" the five bank accounts for which warrants in rem were issued in September, as well as "all other property that has been seized or will be seized in this proceeding at any time, directly from and/or related to" PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker and "all funds identified in the original forfeiture complaint in this action unsealed on April 15."

A press release regarding the complaint states, "Cardroom sought to license its software to major media companies for use on their sports-related sites. Between them, the PokerStars defendants and the Full Tilt defendants entered into agreements whereby they provided such play money services to ESPN/ABC, Fox and NBC. At a meeting with one of the aforementioned networks, the CEO of Cardroom was informed that adoption of his system faced the barrier of the purchase of airtime on the network by PokerStars companies, as the PokerStars companies were tying continued purchase of airtime to use of their software and system on the network's website. Within weeks of meeting with this network, the network announced a deal with PokerStars. The bulk of the money utilized by the PokerStars defendants to purchase time for poker television programs came from funds illegally obtained from United States poker players. Though Full Tilt did not directly interfere in the potential transaction between Cardroom and the network, it was due to the joint conspiracy of the PokerStars defendants and the Full Tilt defendants alleged below that both companies achieved their dominant position in on-line poker."?

Cardroom International "claims a right, title and interest" in the identified funds "based on damages suffered as a result defendants' violation" of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) "in an amount no less than $30 million."

The claim names Chris Ferguson, Howard Lederer, Ray Bitar, and Rafe Furst specifically, claiming rights to the funds seized from their accounts which "cannot be effectively traced to any specific criminal activity violating the laws of the United States, as they are intermixed proceeds of fraudulent activity lasting many years in violation of the laws of the United States, combined with proceeds of legal foreign wagering and other legal activities."

According to the claim, the United States' claim on the funds is "limited to the gross proceeds of the activities occurring a year before the relevant versions of the civil forfeiture complaints was filed" and says that all "excess amounts seized should be made available to creditors of the named defendants."

Further, the claim states, "all funds seized which the United States cannot demonstrate arise from illegal activities specified in 18 USC Section 981 within one year of the relevant date should be given to Claimant in the amount of $30 million or the sum of judgements obtained against any of the named defendants, whichever amount is less."

Read the entire claim on Dockets.Justia.com.

Don't forget to follow us on Twitter and like us on Facebook.

Follow Chad Holloway on Twitter — @ChadAHolloway

Follow Elaine Chaivarlis on Twitter — @LaneyLV


View the original article here